I do not practice family law, but I read the new cases in Ohio as they are reported. Here the court ordered an ex-husband to pay alimony in an amount greater than his income (after federally ordered bankruptcy payments).
Here is a case in which the court of appeals affirmed a trial court that had ordered a man to continue to pay $1,000 per month in (ex-)spousal support. Three months after the divorce, the man had filed for chapter 13 bankruptcy and had a monthly $890 obligation to the bankruptcy trustee. Four months after the divorce, he applied for and was awarded SSI disability receiving $1,242 per month, his only source of income.
somehow the court thought it was acceptable to force him to continue to pay $1000 per month to his ex-wife from his $352 monthly net income remaining after paying the bankruptcy trustee. A significant factor was the man's subsequent marriage to a woman who was employed and paid all their household expenses from her income. The court apparently assumed that either the new wife must make up the shortfall or the 100% disabled ex-husband should get a job.
The court sends a very clear message: If you get divorced and must pay alimony, don't get married (and don't be supported by someone).
The case is Cox. v. Cox, 2015-Ohio-1660.
I read a recent Mother Jones article (don't ask why) that noted that voter ID laws have a negligible effect on elections. OK so far. T...
For a eulogy of Ted Kennedy for the rest of us, go to The Funeral Guy .
What is the truth behind the shooting of Erik Scott at a Costco in Las Vegas on July 10, 2010?. So far, the best that can be said is that w...
Entertaining. Sophomoric, maybe. But it is satirical commentary by two Washington Post political commentators, Dana Milbank and Chris Cill...