The more I read about Climategate, the more obvious it becomes that the so-called scientists involved in creating the global warming hysteria have behaved in some very anti-scientific ways. Sometimes science can prove something that turns out, after further analysis and review (for which the original raw data is VITAL), to be seriously mistaken.
Scientific facts are not determined by consensus, but by rigorous critical analysis after serious study. Climategate has exposed the raw nerve of scientist grand-standing. There is an excellent analysis of the state of the ever evolving Climategate scandal at the Weekly Standard.
Every Climategate denier should read it.
For a eulogy of Ted Kennedy for the rest of us, go to The Funeral Guy .
Entertaining. Sophomoric, maybe. But it is satirical commentary by two Washington Post political commentators, Dana Milbank and Chris Cill...
What is the truth behind the shooting of Erik Scott at a Costco in Las Vegas on July 10, 2010?. So far, the best that can be said is that w...